Legal Opinion · Concurrence

D. H. Overmyer Telecasting Co. v. American Home Assurance Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 1986No. 50215Published

1ConcurrenceMarkus, P.J.

While I reach the same result, I disagree with the reasons provided by the majority opinion.

In appropriate cases, a tort claimant is a proper party for a declaratory relief action to determine the applicability of the alleged tortfeasor’s liability insurance. Celina Mut. Ins. Co. v. Sadler (1966), 6 Ohio App. 2d 161, 165 [35 O.O.2d 319]; Maryland Cas. Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co. (1941), 312 U.S. 270, 274 (applying Ohio law). Certainly, a tort claimant can be the plaintiff for such a declaratory relief action, if he can be a proper defendant. See, e.g., Sainsbury v. Hartford Accident &…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Chitlik v. Allstate Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. CochraneOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Wasserman v. Buckeye Union Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Celina Mutual Ins. Co. v. SadlerOhio Court of Appeals · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API