Legal Opinion

Kalish v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 14, 1983No. 036-83PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CLINTON, Judge.

The Texas Speedy Trial Act, Acts 1977, 65th Leg., ch. 787, p. 1970 (the Act) inserted in Chapter 28 of our code of criminal procedure a new Article 28.061 to provide what consequences follow sustaining a motion to set aside a charging instrument for failure of the State to be ready for trial within applicable time limitations.1 The problem presented in this cause is created by the legislative mandate that a discharge of an accused from one offense is a bar “to any further prosecution ... for any other of*597fense arising out…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McWilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Ordunez v. BeanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Gorman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Dickey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wade v. MaysCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Rios v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Santibanez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Moffett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  5. Ex Parte Infante, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API