Kalish v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CLINTON, Judge.
The Texas Speedy Trial Act, Acts 1977, 65th Leg., ch. 787, p. 1970 (the Act) inserted in Chapter 28 of our code of criminal procedure a new Article 28.061 to provide what consequences follow sustaining a motion to set aside a charging instrument for failure of the State to be ready for trial within applicable time limitations.1 The problem presented in this cause is created by the legislative mandate that a discharge of an accused from one offense is a bar “to any further prosecution ... for any other of*597fense arising out…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ex Parte McWilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Ordunez v. BeanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Gorman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Dickey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Wade v. MaysCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Rios v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Santibanez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Moffett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
- Ex Parte Infante, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.