Elliott v. City Council

(After stating the foregoing facts.) When the plaintiff was appointed.to the position of superintendent of streets and drains for the city of Augusta by the mayor of said city, under the ordinance of March 8, 1927, which ordinance designated him as an employee of the city, and provided that he should work under the direct supervision and control of the mayor, the provisions of *571said ordinance as to the manner in which he should be removed from said position became a part of the contract of employment between the city and the plaintiff. Under the provisions of that ordinance the plaintiff could…