Legal Opinion
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Michael W. Berger, Manhattan Investment Fund Ltd. And Manhattan Capital Management, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 27, 2003No. Docket 01-6254PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed this action against Michael W. Berger in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that Berger violated numerous anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws. The District Court (Denise Cote, Judge) granted summary judgment in favor of the SEC. On appeal, Berger challenges only the District Court’s ruling that it had subject matter jurisdiction over the claims against him. The SEC asserts that Berger, who has fled the United States and is now a fugitive from…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Degen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bersch v. Drexel Firestone, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,021 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Larry D. Blavin, D/B/A Providence Investment AdvisoryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Ltd. v. FicetoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. DiBellaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- In Re Parmalat Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.