Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ferluckaj v. Goldman Sachs & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 2008Published

1Concurrence

Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.,

concur in a memorandum by Maz-zarelli, J., as follows: Defendant Goldman leased several floors in the building at 32 Old Slip Road in Manhattan, including the 29th floor. Its lease provided that the building’s owner, which is not a party to this action, would furnish cleaning services, including window washing. The owner contracted with plaintiffs employer, third-party defendant American Building Mainte*423nance Co. (ABM), to provide those cleaning services. The agreement between the owner and ABM required ABM to clean the exterior and interior of the building’s windows…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blake v. Neighborhood Housing Services of New York City, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Lombardi v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Tonking v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Broggy v. Rockefeller Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Bart v. Universal PicturesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API