Legal Opinion

Bank (First National) v. City of Charlotte

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Civil Action tried at Pall Term, 1881, of Mecklenbue®-Superior Court, before Avery, J. Tl^e suit is brought by the First National Bank of Charlotte and the Atlantic, Tennessee and Ohio Railroad Company, plaintiffs, against the City of Charlotte, defendant, to recover the amount of coupons of certain bonds issued by the defendant city. The facts are set out in the opinion of this court. The defendant appealed [from the judgment of the court below.

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, 0. J.

On February 15th, 1855, the general assembly passed the act incorporating the Atlantic, Tennessee and Ohio Railroad Company wherein are recited the provisions of an act of the legislature of Tennessee passed on February, 26th, 1853, authorizing the formation and organization of a company of the same name, which should have a corporate existence in the states of North Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia and Kentucky, for the purpose of establishing a communication by railroad between the waters of the Atlantic and the Ohio river, and passing through these states, which are re-enacted and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nugent v. the SupervisorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Board of Supervisors of Fulton County v. Mississippi & Wabash RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Kenosha, Rockford & Rock Island Railroad v. MarshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Sparrow v. Evansville & Crawfordsville RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Greenbrier Industrial Exposition v. RodesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Atlantic, Tennessee & Ohio Railroad v. Commissioners of MecklenburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. R. R. Co. v. . CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API