Legal Opinion

Pisciotta v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1982No. 12879PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEES, Judge.

Plaintiffs in this action are the attorneys and their clients who were successful in a personal injury suit. They seek attorneys fees of 40% of an amount recovered by defendant, Sears, pursuant to an intervention filed in the personal injury suit. From an award of $8,000.00 in favor of Plaintiffs, Sears appeals.1

Brenda and Joseph Pisciotta, plaintiffs herein, represented by George J. Roux and Marvin C. Grodsky, also plaintiffs herein, brought suit against various executive officers of Sears, among others. In due course a final judgment was secured against one of Sears executive…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bloomer v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Lyons v. City of ShreveportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Cochrane v. Estate of GuidryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Mire v. Travelers Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Mire v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moody v. ArabieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Pisciotta v. Sears Roebuck, & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API