Moody v. Arabie
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
STOKER, Judge.
In this case we are called upon to decide this question: In a suit for damages for personal injuries sustained by an injured worker in which the worker and his attorney have a contract for payment of attorney’s fees on a contingent fee basis, and in which there is an intervention by a worker’s compensation carrier seeking reimbursement of worker’s compensation benefits paid to the injured plaintiff worker, may the worker’s attorney claim a contingent fee on the entire recovery, including the portion which by law is to be paid to the compensation carrier by preference and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gentry v. PughLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Lyons v. City of ShreveportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Bell v. Carolina Casualty Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Broussard, Broussard & M., Ltd. v. STATE A. &. CU CO.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Moody v. ArabieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moody v. ArabieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- Mitchell v. Clark Equipment Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- Moody v. ArabieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986