Legal Opinion

Weinberg v. Hertz Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 1986PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Fein, J.

This is an action seeking injunctive relief and damages against the Hertz Corporation (Hertz) for acts and practices in the automobile rental business, alleged to be unfair, deceptive and in breach of contract. The allegations before us relate to (1) defendant’s service charges for refueling returned rental cars; (2) the daily charges for insurance coverage in the nature of collision damage waiver (CDW) and personal accident insurance (PAI); and (3) the hourly charges added when a vehicle is returned in New York State beyond the contractual return date.

These…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Friar v. Vanguard Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Brandon v. ChefetzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. King v. Club Med, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. Stellema v. Vantage Press, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. City of New York v. MaulNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Ansoumana v. Gristede's Operating Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  3. Ackerman v. Price WaterhouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Sikes v. Teleline, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  5. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API