Legal Opinion

Ruiz De Molina v. Merritt & Furman Insurance Agency

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 30, 2000No. 98-6958, 98-6975PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Senior Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff sued defendants for damages incurred when his boat was damaged and defendants denied insurance coverage. Two defendants moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The district court construed the motion as one for summary judgment and granted it. After trial, plaintiff won a judgment against the remaining defendants and was awarded damages including $90,000 for mental anguish. Upon motion, the district court struck the mental anguish damages. Plaintiff appeals both judgments.

I

Eladio Ruiz de Molina purchased a sloop named Ariel in June of 1994. 1…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Shotz v. City of Plantation, FLCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  2. In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Bowers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  4. Buckentin v. Suntrust Mortgage Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2013
  5. Koken v. Legion InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API