Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Carpenter v. Waddell

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1865PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Nevada, Lyon. Comity, lion. W. HaydoN presiding.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Nevada, Lyon. Comity, lion. W. HaydoN presiding. Tbe defendants, A. Johnson and J. Waddell, were partners, doing business at Dayton, Lyon County, during the year 1863. While they were thus connected they became indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of ten hundred and nine dollars and twenty-two cents, for labor and materials furnished for them between the 9th day of May, A. D. 1863, and the 14th day of November of the same year; four hundred and ninety-three dollars and eighty cents of which was, however, paid before the…

1Concurrence

Opinion by

Lewis, O. J., Beatty, J.,

concurring.

The first assignment of error which, we will notice in this case, is that the Court below erred in admitting the assignment of Harrub & Co. in evidence; first, because it was not properly stamped, and second, because it does not purport to be the assignment of Harrub & Co., but of one Walter Harrub. The statement discloses the fact that the assignments of the accounts of Harrub & Co. and Birdsall & Co. to plaintiff, were not stamped until they were offered in evidence, when, by permission of the Court, counsel for plaintiff attached the proper…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Craig v. Palo Alto Stock FarmIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Castleman v. RedfordNevada Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Thelin v. Intermountain Lumber & Builders Supply, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API