Legal Opinion
Colorado Water Conservation Board v. City of Central
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided November 28, 2005No. 04SA145PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTINEZ, Justice.
In this water rights dispute, we consider whether, pursuant to section 37-92-305, C.R.S. (2005), a plan for augmentation must include terms and conditions to protect an instream flow right against injury caused by out-of-priority diversions, including diversions made from points associated with senior water rights.
Applicant-Appellee, the City of Central (“Central”), filed an application with the District Court, Water Division No. 1, for a change of water rights, approval of a plan for augmentation, and an adjudication of an ap-propriable right of substitution and exchange.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Aspen Wilderness Workshop, Inc. v. Colorado Water Conservation BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Fogg v. MacAlusoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Coffin v. Left Hand Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1882
- State Engineer v. Castle Meadows, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re N.B.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Jordan v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority v. WolfeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- North Sterling Irrigation District v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.