Legal Opinion

Campisi v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 3, 2005PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*731Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

A correction officer observed petitioner in his cell with an altered heating mechanism, consisting of a large coffee can with a hot element and wire going into a plug device, which he apparently used as a hot pot. Petitioner initially refused the officer’s order to turn over the item, but ultimately complied and then…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jamison v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Sepe v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Roncini v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Brown v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Witherspoon v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Williams v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Croskery v. LaValleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Brown v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Valdez v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Hernandez v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API