Legal Opinion

United States v. Indalecio Ibarra

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 26, 2003No. 02-30389PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Indalecio Ibarra appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Ibarra argues that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of the seizure and search of his automobile conducted by Oregon state police. Ibarra argues that both the seizure and subsequent search of his vehicle were unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Because there was no violation of the Fourth Amendment, we…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Albert Darruthy v. City of MiamiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. Douglas JensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Cole v. Doe 1 Thru 2 Officers of Emeryville Police DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005
  4. United States v. Jacob Del Mundo FaagaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Crowe v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API