Legal Opinion
Ray v. Hill
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 6, 1938No. 26902. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.
January 29, 1937, plaintiff filed his complaint, describing certain shingle mill machinery, and alleging:
“That on or about the 15th day of August, 1933, the defendant, Vester E. Hill, without the permission of the plaintiff and without any right whatsoever, took possession of said property where it was located at Fairfax, in Pierce county, Washington, and removed the same to a point near Ozette lake, in Clallam county, state of Washington, and has ever since detained, and does now detain possession thereof against the will and without the consent of the plaintiff.”
Defendant demurred to the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. Mountain Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Packwood v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- City of Spokane v. Security Savings SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Ball v. ClothierWashington Supreme Court · 1904
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Crown Zellerbach Corp. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Olson v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Gravity Segregation, Llc v. Jerry C. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.