Legal Opinion

Saunders v. Wilson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1857PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Shelby. Tried below before the Hon. Archibald W. 0. Hicks.

1Opinion of the Court

Hemphill, Ch. J.

By agreement, the statement of facts made out and approved in the case of John Saunders, plaintiff in error, v. Alfred Wilson, defendant in error, is adopted as the statement of facts in this case. Both of the suits were commenced in the summer of 1851, nearly ten years after possession taken by Robert Saunders, the father of defendant. In the petition it is alleged that suit was first brought on the 25th September, 1848,—and plaintiff being unable to appear *202at the Spring Term, in 1851, was dismissed for want of prosecution. This was not in proof; but admitting the fact, yet a…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harrell v. HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Van Zandt v. BrantleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  3. Pomeroy v. PearceTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  4. Gause v. GauseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Nilsen v. BonugliCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API