Legal Opinion

Ostrander Ex Rel. Ostrander v. Cone Mills, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 8, 1989No. C6-88-2644Published

1Opinion of the Court

445 N.W.2d 240 (1989)

Dano Lane OSTRANDER, a minor, by Ronald OSTRANDER and Mary Ostrander, his parents and natural guardians, and Mary Ostrander, individually, Plaintiffs,

v.

CONE MILLS, INC., Defendant,

Palmetto Garment Co., Defendant.

CONE MILLS CORPORATION, Third-Party Plaintiff,

v.

Jodi (Jensen) ENGA and Paul Enga, individually, Third-Party Defendants.

No. C6-88-2644.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

September 8, 1989.

Rehearing Denied October 17, 1989.

John M. Steele, Minneapolis, for plaintiffs.

Heidi Hoard, John P. Mandler, Faegre & Benson, Minneapolis, for Cone Mills, Inc.

Susan Hall, Murnane, Conlin,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thill v. Modern Erecting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. MacKu by and Through MacKu v. Drackett Prod. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Korth v. American Family Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Swenson v. Emerson Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. McClish v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API