Legal Opinion

L.H. v. D.H.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 16, 1987No. 87-0349PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScott, C.J.

L.H. (the mother) brought this action to determine the paternity of D.L.H., a child born during the mother’s marriage to D.H. (the husband). Court-ordered blood tests unequivocally excluded the husband and he was dismissed from the action. The husband appeals contending that: (1) the *609trial court erred in concluding that dismissal of the action was not in the best interest of the child pursuant to sec. 767.46(2), Stats.; and (2) the trial court erred in refusing to dismiss the action on the grounds of equitable estoppel.

We conclude that sec. 767.46, Stats., does not allow a trial court to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. AndreasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Barstad v. FrazierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Mercado Ex Rel. Laufer v. MitchellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. M & I Bank v. First American National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. In Re Adoption of YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of GallagherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  2. D. G. v. D. M. K.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Simmons v. ComerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Dg v. DmkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In Re the Marriage of GallagherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API