Whisman v. Georgia
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted and the judgment reversed. He would remand the case for a new trial, it being clear from the record that the principles announced in Miranda v. Arizona, ante, p. 436, were not applied. He sees no reason for discriminating against this petitioner, the case having come here on direct review and being of the same vintage as Miranda…
2Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- State v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- State v. BlodgetteArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Owings v. United States Court of Military AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.