Legal Opinion

Dumas v. Tenacity Constr. Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 3, 2019No. 18-P-293Published

1Opinion of the CourtMassing, J.

*111When a defendant files a motion for relief from a default judgment under Mass. R. Civ. P. 60 (b) (4), 365 Mass. 828 (1974), alleging that the judgment is void because of improper service of process, the judge is bound to accept the defendant's uncontroverted affidavits as true. In this appeal, the defendant, Tenacity Construction Incorporated (Tenacity), asserts that the sheriff's return of service did not controvert the affidavits Tenacity offered in support of its motion, and that the judge therefore lacked the discretion to deny the motion solely because he disbelieved the affidavits.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Old Republic Insurance v. Pacific Financial Services of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  2. Mark E. O'Brien v. R.J. O'Brien & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Cintas Corp. v. Lee's Cleaning Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Robinson Engineering Company, Ltd. Pension Plan and Trust and R. W. Robinson & Associates Company Profit Sharing Plan v. Mark G. GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. Blair v. City of WorcesterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API