Legal Opinion

Lombardo v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 31, 1995No. 95-282VPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge:

INTRODUCTION

This vaccine case turns solely on a question of statutory interpretation. Petitioner, James Lombardo, on behalf of his minor son, filed a petition in the United States Court of Federal Claims on April 7, 1995, seeking compensation for a vaccine-related injury under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (Vaccine Program). 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l et seq. (1988 & Supp. V 1993) (Vaccine Act). Thereafter, on May 18, 1995, Special Master John F. Edwards dismissed the petition, finding that it was time-barred *23pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § SOOaa-lBCaXl).1…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Lisa Munn, Personal Representative of the Estate of Chelsea Vukelich v. The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. MottazSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Alexander v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. DuvallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  2. Zakiya v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Abrams v. Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2009
  4. Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  5. Brown v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API