Legal Opinion

Warren Webster & Co. v. Zac Smith Stationery Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 9, 1930No. 6 Div. 690PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, J,

The plaintiff sued to recover on common counts for goods sold to defendant, consisting largely of a surveying outfit. The purchase was made by W. H. Monahan, Jr., representing defendant in Birmingham, referred to as “District Manager,” his territory embracing the entire state with exception of the counties of Mobile and Baldwin. The order for the goods was on defendant’s letterhead bearing the name of defendant company with W. H. Monahan, Jr., “District Manager,” and was delivered in person by Monahan to plaintiff at its place of business. Plaintiff’s evidence tended to show that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. Tyler Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Southern States Fire Ins. v. KronenbergSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Pennsylvania Fire Ins. v. DraperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Birmingham Mineral Railroad v. Tennessee Coal, Iron RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  5. Louisville Coffin Co. v. StokesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ignatowitch v. McLaughlinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Wilson & Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Schwartz v. Tribunal de Distrito de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952
  4. New Plan Realty Trust v. MorganSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. United Fireworks Manufacturing Co. v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API