Legal Opinion

Rieger v. H. I. S. Motor Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1923No. 17963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

— The plaintiff instituted this action against the H. I. S. Motor Company, a corporation, to rescind a contract of purchase of two thousand shares *413of the capital stock of the corporation, known as treasury stock, and to recover the sum of $10,000 paid therefor, together with interest. The action was based on fraud. The sale of the stock was made through an agent of the corporation acting under an agreement that the corporation would pay all the cost of printing an advertising prospectus to be distributed by the agent among prospective purchasers of stock, and to pay the agént sixty per cent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Neblett v. MacFarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Gatling v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Jones v. GroveWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Bowe v. Provident Loan Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Jackson v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kaas v. PrivetteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  2. Wimmer v. ParsonsWashington Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API