Legal Opinion

State v. Moses

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1975No. 7426SC1040PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the failure of the court to grant his motion for a postponement of the trial for the reason that his counsel was involved in the trial of a murder case for several days prior to the trial of this case and did not have opportunity to make proper preparation. We find no merit in the assignment.

While a motion for continuance is ordinarily addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and its ruling thereon is not subject to review absent an abuse of discretion, 2 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Criminal Law, § 91, where the motion is based on a right…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. AccorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. TuggleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. RigsbeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API