State v. Moses
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Defendant assigns as error the failure of the court to grant his motion for a postponement of the trial for the reason that his counsel was involved in the trial of a murder case for several days prior to the trial of this case and did not have opportunity to make proper preparation. We find no merit in the assignment.
While a motion for continuance is ordinarily addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and its ruling thereon is not subject to review absent an abuse of discretion, 2 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Criminal Law, § 91, where the motion is based on a right…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. AccorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. TuggleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. RigsbeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978