Legal Opinion

Darryl Holland v. Edward R. Donnelly, Superintendent, Wende Correctional Facility

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 31, 2003No. 02-2358PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

We consider in this appeal of the denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, an equal protection challenge to New York’s sentencing procedures in N.Y. Criminal Procedure Law (“C.P.L.”) § 400.27. 1 Petitioner asserts that the procedures arbitrarily permit defendants for whom the death penalty is sought to be sentenced to life imprisonment without parole only by a unanimous jury (prohibiting a judge from imposing that punishment), while withholding a jury determination of the appropriateness of life without parole from defendants for whom the death penalty is not sought…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Angel Sellan v. Robert KuhlmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  5. People v. HansenNew York Court of Appeals · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cummings v. BurgeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2008
  2. Liggins v. BurgeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. Parker v. PhillipsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
  4. Holland v. Donnelly, Superintendent, Wende Correctional FacilitySupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Krivoi v. ChappiusDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API