Legal Opinion

Continental Bank, N.A. v. Modansky

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 9, 1991No. 90 C 1696PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BUA, District Judge.

This is a case of guaranty agreements. Continental Bank, N.A. (“Continental”) seeks to enforce these agreements against defendants Sheldon Modansky, Aaron Mo-dansky, and Ajayem Investors Corporation (“Modanskys”) in order to recover approximately $9,765,575, together with costs.

The facts alleged by the parties follow the usual pattern: Continental extended loans, in the form of lines of credit, to four lumber companies (“borrowers”). The Mo-danskys secured the loans. They signed agreements allegedly guaranteeing payment of all amounts owed to Continental by the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Mid-State Fertilizer Co., Lasley Kimmel, and Maxine Kimmel v. Exchange National Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Farmer City State Bank v. GuingrichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. Zick v. Verson Allsteel Press Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  5. Ishak v. Elgin National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Transclean Corp. v. Bridgewood Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
  2. United Air Lines, Inc. v. ALG, INC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API