Continental Bank, N.A. v. Modansky
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BUA, District Judge.
This is a case of guaranty agreements. Continental Bank, N.A. (“Continental”) seeks to enforce these agreements against defendants Sheldon Modansky, Aaron Mo-dansky, and Ajayem Investors Corporation (“Modanskys”) in order to recover approximately $9,765,575, together with costs.
The facts alleged by the parties follow the usual pattern: Continental extended loans, in the form of lines of credit, to four lumber companies (“borrowers”). The Mo-danskys secured the loans. They signed agreements allegedly guaranteeing payment of all amounts owed to Continental by the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mid-State Fertilizer Co., Lasley Kimmel, and Maxine Kimmel v. Exchange National Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Farmer City State Bank v. GuingrichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Zick v. Verson Allsteel Press Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Ishak v. Elgin National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Transclean Corp. v. Bridgewood Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. ALG, INC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996