Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 5, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Stephens. Tried below before Hon. T. H. Conner.

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS,

Associate Justice.—The question in this case is whether the .judgment in favor of plaintiff below, which awarded him the land sued for, was properly rendered for the costs of the suit against the smeties of the defendant on his replevy hond, given as provided in the sequestration statute.

It has been decided by this court that such replevy bond does not render the sureties liable for the costs of the suit. Collier v. Myers, 37 S. W. Rep., 183. It is quite clear that in terms the bond creates no such liability. But whether in executing the replevy bond the sureties do not make…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mills v. HackettTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Trammell v. TrammellTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Sampson v. SolinskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890
  4. Saylor v. MarxTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Collier v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tripplett v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Riggle v. Automobile Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Rose v. BrantleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Williams v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. McIntyre v. EmersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API