Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Pospiech

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1939No. Docket No. 22, Calendar No. 40,423PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChandler, J.

The facts are not in dispute. Plaintiffs herein are, and for a period of many years have been, trustees under the last will and testament of Elliott T. Slocum, deceased. Said will contained the following provisions relative to the powers of the testamentary trustees:

“In reinvesting the money belonging to my estate I direct that my executors and trustees invest only in good municipal bonds.
“I give my executors and trustees the power to buy and sell real estate whenever they think it best and for the interest and good of the estate.
“I hereby nominate and appoint the Union Guardian Trust Company…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. Prov. Tr. Co., TrusteeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Dorrance's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Dingman v. BoyleIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Larmer v. PriceIllinois Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of PopeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Hanson v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1950
  3. Detroit Trust Co. v. BlakelyMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Kleynenberg v. Highlands Realty Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Spies v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API