Legal Opinion

Alicia Wilson Kuykendall v. City of San Antonio Individually and on Behalf of the City of San Antonio Dangerous Structure Determination Board

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided February 1, 2012No. 08-10-00208-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHRISTOPHER ANTCLIFF, Justice.

Ms. Alicia Kuykendall appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the San Antonio Dangerous Structure Determination Board’s decision ordering two buildings to be demolished. She raises three issues for this Court’s review. Issues One and Three challenge the notice procedures related to the condemnation proceedings on due process grounds. In Issue Two, Ms. Kuykendall asserts that the demolition order entered by the administrative body below is erroneous because she was not provided proper notice of the proceedings. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Office of Public Utility Counsel v. Public Utility CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Nussbaum v. City of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
  4. Milestone Potranco Development, Ltd. v. City of San Antonio, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
  5. Perkins v. City of San Antonio, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  2. City of Houston v. James & Elizabeth Carlson, Jose & Liz Referente, Roger Campodonico, Sergio A. Lopez, Yan Wang & Hui Yao, Daniel & Andrea Seluk, Robert Hutchins, Robert & Kelly Farfan, Bonnie Corbett, Helen Pagola, Manny Espinola, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
  3. Western Marketing, Inc. and Todd Pitts v. AEG Petroleum, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API