Legal Opinion

Deason v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 22, 2002No. 01-610CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MILLER, Judge.

This civilian pay case is before the court on defendant’s motion pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1) to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff filed suit seeking pay for overtime based on the Federal Employees Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 5542-5545 (2002), and various federal regulations, including an overtime policy of the Department of the Army. Defendant would hold plaintiff to the statutory six-year limitations period for the accrual of his claim. Plaintiff sets forth compelling facts that implicate the doctrine of equitable tolling. Argument is deemed unnecessary.

FACT…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ewer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API