Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Williamson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 29, 1965No. 4379PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Justice.

Defendant appeals from judgment against him based on a jury verdict in a personal injury action arising out of an intersec-tional automobile collision. We affirm.

Complaints are made of jury argument of plaintiffs' counsel. There is no properly preserved record of the argument, and the points may not be considered. See Smith v. United Gas Pipe Line Co., 149 Tex. 69, 228 S.W.2d 139, 143.

It is urged the trial court erred in omitting “unbroken by any new and independent cause” from the definition of “proximate cause” in the charge. Defendant’s pleading contains no reference to new…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Querner v. De SpainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Plainview v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API