Legal Opinion

Reed Stenhouse, Inc. of Missouri v. Portnoy

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1982No. 43951, 43975PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County sustaining Reed Stenhouse, Inc.’s (hereinafter plaintiff) motion for new trial following a verdict by a jury for Paul Portnoy (hereinafter defendant) on his counterclaim for $84,-000.00 plus interest in a breach of contract suit initiated by plaintiff. 1 The jury found against plaintiff on its cause of action against the defendant. 2

We affirm the action of the trial court in granting plaintiff a new trial.

The following facts were adduced at trial. Plaintiff brought an action against defendant to recover…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Koehler v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Berger v. McBride & Son Builders, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. JesseeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Braun v. LorenzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Aluminum Products Enterprises, Inc. v. Fuhrmann Tooling and Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Jablonski v. Barton Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Harris v. WashingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Buder v. MartinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Boatmen's Bank of Mid-Missouri v. Crossroads West Shopping Center, Ltd.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API