Legal Opinion

Norris v. Pacific Indemnity Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1952No. L. A. 22066Published

1Opinion of the Court

39 Cal.2d 420 (1952)

DAVID MORGAN NORRIS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY (a Corporation), Respondent; ZURICH GENERAL ACCIDENT AND LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Cross-Defendant and Appellant.

L. A. No. 22066.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Aug. 5, 1952.

Parker, Stanbury, Reese & McGee and Raymond G. Stanbury for Appellants.

Jennings & Belcher, Stevens Fargo and Louis E. Kearney for Respondent.

SHENK, J.

David Morgan Norris and Irvin Victor Norris are father and minor son. They are or are about to be defendants in an action to recover damages for personal injuries…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  2. Souza v. CortiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Odden v. Union Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Hinton v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  5. O'Roak v. Lloyds Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API