Legal Opinion
Kukoda v. Schneider
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
James A. Roe, Jr., J.
Plaintiff moves for an order:
“ 1. Dismissing the affirmative defense contained in defendant Schneider’s answer upon the ground that a defense is not stated therein, pursuant to Rule 3211(h) CPLR;
“ 2. Directing an immediate trial of the issues raised on this motion, pursuant to Rule 3211(c); and
‘ ‘ 3. For such other and further relief as may be proper. ’ ’ This action is to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by the plaintiff on January 23,1963 when the defendant Balta’s automobile, in which he was a passenger, came into contact with the automobile…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gaines v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Henderson v. HendersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Friedman v. Long Island Rail RoadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
- Brainard v. BrainardNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Friedman v. Long Island Rail Road CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
3Cited by4 opinions
- Blatz v. BenschineNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- Vernon v. Rock-Ledge House, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1966
- Schneikraut v. Gerges Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Congregational Realty Corp. v. Congregation Bnai IsraelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968