Legal Opinion

Kukoda v. Schneider

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James A. Roe, Jr., J.

Plaintiff moves for an order:

“ 1. Dismissing the affirmative defense contained in defendant Schneider’s answer upon the ground that a defense is not stated therein, pursuant to Rule 3211(h) CPLR;
“ 2. Directing an immediate trial of the issues raised on this motion, pursuant to Rule 3211(c); and

‘ ‘ 3. For such other and further relief as may be proper. ’ ’ This action is to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by the plaintiff on January 23,1963 when the defendant Balta’s automobile, in which he was a passenger, came into contact with the automobile…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gaines v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Henderson v. HendersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Friedman v. Long Island Rail RoadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
  4. Brainard v. BrainardNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Friedman v. Long Island Rail Road CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1948

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blatz v. BenschineNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Vernon v. Rock-Ledge House, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Schneikraut v. Gerges Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  4. Congregational Realty Corp. v. Congregation Bnai IsraelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API