Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 7, 1986No. Appeals, Nos. 1144 C.D. 1984, 1145 C.D. 1984 and 49 C.D. 1985PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Paleadino,

The above-named cases are consolidated because they involve a common issue. In cases No. 1144 C.D. 1984 and No. 1145 C.D. 1984, the Claimants are Arlene Hoffman and Muriel Kinderman, respectively, who are employed by Deborah Dress, Inc.1 In case No. 49 C.D. 1985, the Claimants are Evelyn L. Dice, Phyllis F. Snyder, Alice J. Fritz, Myrna B. Shatzer, Mabel R. Peiffer, Larue A. Sheaffer, and Naomi T. Baker, who are employed by Nicky Lee Sportswear. Claimants Hoffman and Kinderman are seeking unemployment compensation benefits for a one-week period ending July 10, 1982,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Susquehanna Collieries Division v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Dennis v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Eckenrode v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. United States Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Carl Colteryahn Dairy, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Appel v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API