Legal Opinion

Hill v. Eaton & Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 1944No. Civ. 12616PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

—Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of non-suit. His action for damages for personal injuries was filed against Eaton & Smith who were the general contractors engaged in erecting the building upon which plaintiff was injured. The building comprised a number of units, each unit forming a separate airplane hangar. At the time of his injury plaintiff was employed by the Alta Roofing Co., who had subcontracted to place a roof upon the building. There is no real dispute as to the facts.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, he had proved at the time of nonsuit that he…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crane v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Shanley v. American Olive Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Mautino v. Sutter Hospital Assn.California Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Dingman v. AF Mattock CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Blodgett v. B. H. Dyas Co.California Supreme Court · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Biondini v. Amship Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Pauly v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Beauchamp v. Los Gatos Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Slovick v. James I. Barnes Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Srader v. Pecos Construction CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API