Daniel Wong v. City of Roseville, et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL WONG, No. 2:26–cv–01599–DC–CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. (ECF No. 2) 14 CITY OF ROSEVILLE, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Daniel Wong is representing himself in this action and seeks leave to proceed in 18 forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915.1

Plaintiff’s application in support of the IFP 19 request makes the required financial showing. Accordingly, the Court grants Plaintiff’s IFP 20 request. 21 SCREENING REQUIREMENT 22 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the court must…