Legal Opinion
Rodgers v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided February 11, 1966PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Judge.
Appellant seeks a reversal of his conviction and sentence of one year for the third violation of the Local Option Law. The only ground for reversal with any merit relates to the instructions given by the trial court. Instruction number one is as follows :
“If the jury believe from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant, Orville (Tood) Rodgers, in Casey County, and before the finding of the indictment herein, and on or about the 25th day of August, 1965, did unlawfully sell to Joe Grote, two pints of liquor for which he paid Rodgers the sum of ($9.00) Dollars,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coleman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Brown v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
- Denham v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
- Marcum v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
- Tuttle v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Payne v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
- Hardin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
- Satterly v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
- Covington v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1972
- House v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.