Stoll v. United Way of Champaign County, Illinois, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Concurrence
JUSTICE MYERSCOUGH,
specially concurring:
I concur with the majority’s result but write separately to address the issue of preemption. Despite asking the parties to discuss preemption at oral argument, and despite the fact that the majority of the discussion at oral argument concerned preemption, the majority does not address that issue.
Preemption can, as discussed below, have subject-matter jurisdiction implications. Although United Way did not raise preemption before the trial court or on appeal, this court has a duty to sua sponte consider whether jurisdiction exists. See In re Marriage of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Retail Clerks International Ass'n, Local Unions Nos. 128 & 633 v. Lion Dry Goods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.