Legal Opinion

Kosinski v. Hines

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1920No. 15578PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of- the superior court for Pierce county, Card, J., entered June 23, 1919, dismissing on the merits an action in tort on challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, and denying plaintiff’s motion for a voluntary nonsuit.

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

The appellant was injured while in the employ of the respondent and brought this action to recover damages. At the conclusion of the appellant’s testimony, the respondent challenged the sufficiency of the evidence and moved that the jury be discharged and the cause dismissed, and that judgment of dismissal be entered in the respondent’s favor. The motion was argued by counsel for both parties and the matter submitted for decision, whereupon the following occurred:

“The Court: The court ordinarily is very slow to take a case away from the jury, but I deem it my duty to do so in this case. There…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. ShreveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  2. Walker v. HellerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Huntt v. McNameeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1905
  4. Burns v. ReigelsbergerIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Cohn v. RumelyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Western Stevedore Co. v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Berryman v. MoodySupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  3. Herr v. SchwagerWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Studley v. StudleyWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. German Mexican Co. v. Mexican Pacific Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API