Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tabas

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1982No. 2410PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN der VOORT, Judge:

A jury found appellant guilty of possession of phentermine and marijuana with intent to deliver, and criminal conspiracy. Post-trial motions were denied and appellant was sentenced to pay a fine of $500 and to serve a term of IIV2 to 23 months imprisonment.

The appeal to this court, filed by appellate counsel, who replaced trial counsel, raises four arguments involving fourteen sub-issues.

We will discuss the issues in a numerical order different from that of the appellant’s.

1. The sufficiency of the evidence.

Counsel argues that the Commonwealth failed to prove:

a) that…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. DriscollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. TharpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. State v. BrinkleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. RandallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. RandallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API