Commonwealth v. Tabas
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
VAN der VOORT, Judge:
A jury found appellant guilty of possession of phentermine and marijuana with intent to deliver, and criminal conspiracy. Post-trial motions were denied and appellant was sentenced to pay a fine of $500 and to serve a term of IIV2 to 23 months imprisonment.
The appeal to this court, filed by appellate counsel, who replaced trial counsel, raises four arguments involving fourteen sub-issues.
We will discuss the issues in a numerical order different from that of the appellant’s.
1. The sufficiency of the evidence.
Counsel argues that the Commonwealth failed to prove:
a) that…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. DriscollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. TharpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- State v. BrinkleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Commonwealth v. RandallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. RandallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.