Legal Opinion

Dennis E. Kinworthy v. Soo Line Railroad Company, d/b/a CP Rail System

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 4, 2015No. A13-915Published

1Opinion of the Court

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A13-0915 Court of Appeals Dietzen, J. Concurring, Lillehaug, J. Dennis E. Kinworthy, Appellant, vs. Filed: March 4, 2015 Office of Appellate Courts Soo Line Railroad Company, d/b/a CP Rail System, Respondent. ________________________ Randal W. LeNeave, Richard L. Carlson, Hunegs, LeNeave, & Kvas, P.A., Wayzata, Minnesota, for appellant. Megan K. Ricke, Jeffrey A. Abrahamson, Ricke & Sweeney, P.A., Saint Paul, Minnesota, for respondent. ________________________ SYLLABUS 1. The recoverability of prejudgment interest in an action brought in state court under…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API