Legal Opinion
Storm-Eggink v. Gottfried
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 2, 2011No. 10-823-CVPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff-Appellant Abigail Storm-Eggink, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing her complaint sua sponte. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history of the case, and issues on appeal.
Although the district court did not specify the basis for its decision dismissing Storm-Eggink’s complaint, “we may affirm on any basis for which there is sufficient support in the record, including grounds not relied on by the District Court.” Ferrari v. Town of Nassau, 471 F.3d 363, 365 (2d Cir.2006) (per curiam). A district…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Robinson v. Overseas Military Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Connecticut Action Now, Inc. v. Roberts Plating Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Hirsch v. City of N.Y.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Hom v. BrennanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Altimonte v. LebozDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2021
- Baltas v. BowersDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Baron v. LambertDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2025
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.