Legal Opinion

MASAYESVA FOR HOPI INDIAN TRIBE v. Zah

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided June 18, 1992No. CIV 74-842 PCT EHCPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE: HOPI CLAIMS

EARL H. CARROLL, District Judge. *

INTRODUCTION

I. Parties

Plaintiff Vernon Masayesva is the duly authorized Chairman of the Hopi Tribal Council of the Hopi Tribe, and appears herein as representative of the Hopi Tribe and its villages, clans and individual members.

Defendant Peterson Zah is the duly authorized Chairman of the Navajo Tribal Council, and appears herein as representative of the Navajo Nation 1 and its chapters, clans, and individual members.

Evelyn James is the duly authorized spokesperson of the San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Jones, Chairman of Navajo Tribal Council of Navajo Indian Tribe v. Healing, Chairman of Hopi Council of Hopi Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Healing v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1962
  4. Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  5. Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Masayesva v. ZahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. Masayesva v. ZahDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1992
  3. 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7157, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,233 Vernon Masayesva, Chairman of the Hopi Tribal Council of the Hopi Indian Tribe, for and on Behalf of the Hopi Indian Tribe v. Peterson Zah, Chairman of the Navajo Tribal Council of the Navajo Indian Tribe, for and on Behalf of the Navajo Indian Tribe, Evelyn James, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API