Legal Opinion
Masayesva v. Zah
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided July 10, 1992No. CIV 74-842 PCT EHCPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
RE: SAN JUAN SOUTHERN PAIUTE CLAIMS
EARL H. CARROLL, District Judge. *
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Vernon Masayesva is the duly authorized Chairman of the Hopi Tribal Council of the Hopi Tribe, and appears herein as representative of the Hopi Tribe and its villages, clans and individual members.
Defendant Peterson Zah is the duly authorized Chairman of the Navajo Tribal Council, and appears herein as representa tive of the Navajo Nation 1 and its chapters, clans, and individual members.
Evelyn James is the duly authorized spokesperson of the San Juan Southern…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States of America, Makah Indian Tribe, Plaintiff-Intervenor/appellant v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonaldDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1978
- Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Attakai v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Masayesva v. ZahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7157, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,233 Vernon Masayesva, Chairman of the Hopi Tribal Council of the Hopi Indian Tribe, for and on Behalf of the Hopi Indian Tribe v. Peterson Zah, Chairman of the Navajo Tribal Council of the Navajo Indian Tribe, for and on Behalf of the Navajo Indian Tribe, Evelyn James, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995