Legal Opinion

State v. Choy Foo

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 2016No. CAAP-13-0000636PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

NAKAMURA, C.J.

The question presented in this appeal is whether a delay caused by the referral of Defendant-Appellee Quincy L.F. Choy Foo III (Choy Foo) to the Public Defender’s Office, to enable him to seek a court-appointed lawyer, constituted an excludable delay for speedy trial purposes under Hawai'i Rules of Penal Procedure (HRPP) Rule 48 (2000). At Choy Foo’s initial arraignment, for which he appeared without counsel, the court referred Choy Foo to the Public Defender’s Office and set a new hearing in twenty-one days for Choy Foo to demand or waive his right to a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. State v. EstencionHawaii Supreme Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Choy Foo.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API