Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Swarthmore Borough v. Public Service Commission

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 14, 1923No. Appeals, Nos. 255 and 256Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart:

The Philadelphia, Morton & Swarthmore Street Railway Company, in 1900, entered into an agreement with the Borough of Swarthmore to keep in good order the roadway, from curb to curb, and the bridges, flagstones, gutters and drains along the route of the railway through the borough. The enacting clause of the ordinance grants to the company the right, “under certain conditions, to construct, maintain and operate an extension of its street railway in the borough,” some of the conditions being those just recited.

The majority opinion does not deny that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Leiper v. Baltimore & Philadelphia RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Citizens Passenger Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. City of Scranton v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. New Street Bridge Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Norristown v. Reading Transit & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API