United Copper Securities Co. v. Amalgamated Copper Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
1Opinion of the Court
WARD, Circuit Judge.
This is an action at law by two stockholders of the United Copper Company, on behalf of themselves and all other stockholders of, that company, averring that they had asked the defendant the United Copper Company to bring the suit and it had refused to do so, to recover treble damages under section 7 of the Sherman Act of July 2, 1890 (26 Stat. 210, c. 647), from certain of the individual and corporate defendants on the ground of conspiracy to create a monopoly in the interstate commerce and trade in copper produced in the state of Montana. The complaint alleges that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Ames v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1909
- Metcalf v. American School-Furniture Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1901
- Morrill v. Little Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Backus-Brooks Co. v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Rogers v. American Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Goetz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1935
- Rogers v. American Can CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962