Earthworks' Oil & Gas Accountability Project v. New Mexico Oil Conservation Commission
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Judge.
{1} Petitioners appeal the New Mexico Oil Conservation Commission’s (the Commission) order promulgating a 2013 version of 19.15.17NMAC (6/28/2013) (the2013 Rule), which is commonly referred to as the “Pit Rule.” Petitioners make three arguments. First, they contend that the Commission had no jurisdiction to create the 2013 Rule because a previous version of the rule was the subject of a pending appeal in the courts at the time the 2013 Rule was adopted. Second, Petitioners argue that the Commission’s decision to issue the 2013 Rule is arbitrary and capricious because it…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Rio Grande Chapter of the Sierra Club v. New Mexico Mining CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- Santa Fe Exploration Co. v. Oil Conservation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Nesbit v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Behles v. New Mexico Public Service CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Counseling Center, Inc. v. N.M. Human Servs. Dep'tNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
- Elephant Butte Irrigation Dist. v. N.M. Water Quality Control Comm'nNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2022