Legal Opinion
Wanda Henke v. United States Department of Commerce and National Science Foundation
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 17, 1996No. 95-5195PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD.
WALD, Circuit Judge:
The issue in this case is whether the Department of Commerce’s Advanced Technology Program (“ATP”) maintains a “system of records” containing “records” about appellee Wanda Henke, within the meaning of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a (1994) (“Act”). Henke is the President and co-owner of Dynamic In Situ Geotechnical Testing, Inc. (“Dynamic”) — a company which develops earthquake engineering technology. Between 1990 and 1992 Dynamic submitted three applications for competitive high-technology grants from the ATP, each of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Richard C. Bartel v. Federal Aviation Administration Richard C. Bartel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Michael T. Albright v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Smiertka v. UNITED STATES DEPT. OF TREASURY, ETC.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Sussman v. United States Marshals ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Mobley v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- McCready, Sheila v. Nicholson, R. JamesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- U.S. Office of Pers. Mgmt. Data SEC. Breach Litig. v. Office of Pers. Mgmt.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.